5331 stories
·
16 followers

July 4th fireworks in D.C. will ‘shatter’ world record, organizers say

1 Comment

The bangs and booms will echo longer and louder into the night at Washington’s official Fourth of July celebration this year if event planners can achieve their goal of presenting the world’s largest ever fireworks display.

Freedom 250, a public-private partnership launched by the White House in December, says the fireworks on the National Mall will “shatter” world records, according to a statement provided to Axios, which first reported the news.

A typical Fourth of July fireworks show on the Mall lasts about 17 to 20 minutes and the number of fireworks set off in recent years has ranged from approximately 10,000 to 20,000 shells. But that’s just a handful of sparklers compared to the world record set in Manila in 2016 when organizers launched about 809,000 fireworks.

That’s the record organizers for the upcoming celebration hope to break.

(Dog owners take heed. The Manila show lasted a little over an hour.)

This year’s “breathtaking fireworks” will “stand as the most spectacular firework display the world has ever seen,” Freedom 250 spokesperson Rachel Reisner said in the group’s statement.

Freedom 250 did not immediately respond to an email from The Washington Post seeking confirmation that it planned to exceed the 809,000 fireworks record, how long the show would last or how much it would cost.

Jodi Dague, marketing director for Pyrotecnico, the Pennsylvania-based company presenting the fireworks, confirmed in an email that the show would be a “blowout for sure” but did not answer additional questions about the scope and cost of the production

The National Park Service directed requests for comment to Freedom 250. NPS did not say whether the organization had submitted a permit request for the event.

In February, the Interior Department first hinted at the size of this year’s display.

“This Independence Day will be one for the history books,” the agency posted on social media. “As America celebrates 250 years of freedom, fireworks over the National Mall are expected to be nearly 20 times larger than a typical year, marking an unforgettable celebration in the heart of the Nation’s Capital.”

A spokesperson for Lindsey Appiah, D.C.’s deputy mayor for public safety and justice, said all questions about fireworks should be directed to event organizers. The person did not respond to questions about whether the District was aware of the expanded fireworks plan or who would be paying for it.

Appiah announced Wednesday that this year’s Fourth of July celebration in the District had been designated a National Special Security Event, the nation’s highest security designation. The decision, made by the Department of Homeland Security, means Washington will be flooded with law enforcement personnel and equipment around the series of events planned by the Trump administration and affiliated groups to mark America’s 250th birthday.

The NSSE designation is typically given to events deemed potential targets for terrorism or other criminal activity, such as the State of the Union address, presidential inaugurations or visits by world leaders.

With the designation, the Secret Service will be in charge of coordinating all security.

“The decision is based, in part, on the event’s significance, size and attendees,” a Secret Service spokesperson said in an email. “Designating an event an NSSE allows for considerable resources from the federal government, as well as vital assistance from state and local partners, to be used to force multiply all available security resources.”

Read the whole story
mareino
2 hours ago
reply
40x the usual amount of fireworks. This is going to SUCK.
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

Why kids don’t go anywhere anymore

1 Comment

I do not think of myself as an especially permissive or relaxed parent — I only seem low-key and non-anxious compared to Kate. But I was shocked by this Institute for Family Studies survey of what contemporary American children are and are not allowed to do unsupervised at various ages.

The fact that a quarter of 11-year-olds are not allowed to leave the house unsupervised doesn’t seem all that shocking, until you realize that this means they’re not allowed to play in their yard unsupervised.1 Leaving the yard is a whole separate category.

I’ve also been surprised to see so much skepticism about the idea that nine- and 10-year-olds can be left home alone. We are a family with two parents who both have flexible schedules and just one child, so it’s not like our kid is left home alone all that frequently. But sometimes it’s the logistically reasonable course of action and what’s the problem?

The thing that really makes us outliers, though, is that our child is allowed to “leave the street” in the parlance of this poll and walk to places in the neighborhood.

Yet even though that’s the answer I would give to a pollster (because it’s accurate), I have to confess that in practice, he doesn’t often walk places in the neighborhood without an adult.

One reason for that is just that norms are self-reining and sticky; most people modulate their own behavior in part to match the behavior of peers. And if his friends aren’t allowed to walk around the neighborhood, he won’t do much of that either.

But I do think there’s more than sheer conformity at work here.

Read more



Read the whole story
mareino
2 hours ago
reply
I'm the weirdo. My daughter was allowed to walk herself the 2 blocks to elementary school (although the government would not allow her to walk herself home until she turned 8). Now she's at a middle school across town, and as long as she tells us where she is, she can go anywhere in the city (although, again, the government will not allow teens to be in "hangout" areas after 8 pm.)
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

Opinion | We’re Thinking About Mental Health Diagnoses All Wrong

1 Comment

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Guest Essay

Credit...Yann Kebbi

Awais Aftab

Dr. Aftab is a psychiatrist and clinical associate professor of psychiatry at Case Western Reserve University.

My patients often ask if I think they have a particular psychiatric diagnosis, such as bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism. The way they ask suggests they believe that as their psychiatrist, I can identify hidden attributes in their brains, much in the same way one of my physician colleagues might diagnose a patient with a genetic mutation or bacterial infection.

The reality is messier and, in some ways, unsettling. When psychiatrists say that you “have A.D.H.D.,” what they really mean is something like this: After spending time listening to you, talking with people who know you and observing how you think and behave, I’ve made a judgment call that your experience fits a behavioral pattern we currently call A.D.H.D. It’s a cluster of problems and tendencies that travel together often enough that we’ve observed it, given it a name and studied it. Patterns like these are handy for picking treatments that might be helpful, but they don’t settle the deeper questions about how your brain works or what kind of person you are.

For decades, the public conversation about mental health has been routed through the categories in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or D.S.M., the American Psychiatric Association’s official compilation of psychiatric disorders. Symptom-based categories have been convenient for professional communication, insurance billing and conducting clinical trials, but they have given the false impression that each mental disorder is a relatively distinct problem with clear boundaries and an essence that makes it what it is.

Scientific evidence accumulated from multiple lines of inquiry, including genetics, brain imaging and circuity, and measures of the brain’s electrical activity, shows that while there are biological irregularities associated with mental illnesses, the patterns we see in these scientific studies don’t neatly match up with diagnoses in the D.S.M. For instance, two people might have a similar genetic profile, but one will be clinically diagnosed with bipolar disorder and the other with schizophrenia. Neither genetics nor brain scans can distinguish a person with depression, A.D.H.D. or autism from one without.

That doesn’t mean that psychiatric diagnoses are meaningless labels or arbitrary symptom collections. They are practical tools that provide a shared language to describe very real patterns of distress and impairment and can help shape treatment. In practice, clinicians use them flexibly rather than rigidly.

Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter  Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning.

The problem is that when categories are the only language we have for talking about mental health difficulties, and when public discourse treats them as definitive explanations, patients and the public are left with a picture of the mind that is far too simple.

Here is what I want my patients to know:

1) Symptoms of mental illness exist on a continuum. Research has shown that they are distributed continuously in populations, similar to height, intelligence and temperamental features. This is one reason that some researchers have proposed replacing traditional diagnostic categories with alternative approaches that treat mental health problems more like a series of volume knobs than an on-off switch.

2) The symptoms of mental illness reinforce one another. An important theory in psychiatry, known as network theory, posits that mental health problems emerge from symptoms pushing and pulling on one another in self-reinforcing loops. Being unable to sleep can fuel daytime nervousness; nervousness can drain energy; low energy can lead to social isolation; isolation can worsen depressive rumination; and rumination can make it difficult to sleep. And so on. Symptoms are often triggered by life stressors, but once the symptom arrangement becomes self-sustaining, it continues on long after the stressor has disappeared.

3) At the start, mental health problems are open-ended and can evolve into various different diagnoses. Just as conditions like cancer and diabetes are seen as developing through stages, researchers are increasingly talking about stages of mental illness, from stage 0 (at risk) to stage 4 (resistant to common treatments).

The progression is not always linear or predetermined, especially in early stages. A 14-year-old presenting with anxiety could grow into a person with an anxiety disorder but could as easily develop depression, psychosis or substance abuse, or live a healthy life. Parents often want to know the precise diagnostic category for their child’s mental health challenges, but the truth is that the symptoms are inherently ambiguous and dynamic, and it is better not to force them into an ill-fitting fixed category.

4) Diagnostic labels are frequently blind to the collision between who people are and what their life demands of them. A woman prone to nervousness might struggle in a stressful work environment. A man diagnosed with A.D.H.D. as a child might have never needed stimulants until he started working two jobs to support his family and the chronic sleep deprivation made his attention problems unmanageable.

These are not straightforward cases of disorders internal to a person. They are mismatches between a person’s particular traits and capacities and what the individual’s circumstances require of him or her. They are also some of the most common problems in mental health care.

5) Understanding symptoms only in terms of disorder can obscure their meaning. We have forgotten that symptoms are not always diseases. Many uncomfortable bodily and mental experiences — pain, cough, fever, anxiety, low mood — are signals that evolved because they were useful to our survival in the course of evolution. Not being anxious in the presence of a predator is more costly than being anxious at rustling sounds that turn out to be just wind.

From an evolutionary perspective, sadness and worry are mental defenses against futile persistence and potential danger. Just as pain is your body’s signal that you are injured, sadness and worry can be signals that something in your life goals or situation needs to change. The problem is that these defenses can frequently misfire or get stuck, just as a cough can persist long after the infection is gone.

6) Personality shapes the expression and treatment of mental health problems. In my clinical experience, this is where some of the most important differences between patients lie. Two people may have the same symptoms of anxiety but for entirely different psychological reasons and with different treatment needs.

One person’s panic may be linked to a deep fear of abandonment; another’s may be tied to harsh self-criticism and shame. Some people are prone to self-blame and sensitivity to loss, while others crave connection and attention. Mental health problems are shaped by the interaction between these enduring personality patterns, as well as a person’s strengths and weaknesses in regulating emotions and impulses.

In my practice, I routinely see patients who have been diagnosed with depression and anxiety by one clinician, bipolar disorder by another and post-traumatic stress disorder by a third, at different points in their lives. They arrive confused and frustrated, asking: What disorder do I really have? The honest answer is: all of them and none of them. Each of these labels can capture something useful and inform treatment options, but none of them do justice to the dimensional and dynamic nature of mental illness.

Your mental health problems are not caused by a simple thing that you either have or don’t have. They are patterns shaped by who we are as people and that, in turn, shape the people we become. This is a more complicated story than “chemical imbalance” or “brain disease.” But it is closer to the truth. And an honest story is what you need to make sense of what is happening to you and to find your way through it.

Related Content

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Read the whole story
mareino
3 days ago
reply
"These are not straightforward cases of disorders internal to a person. They are mismatches between a person’s particular traits and capacities and what the individual’s circumstances require of him or her. They are also some of the most common problems in mental health care."
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

Meet the candidates running to be D.C.’s delegate to Congress

1 Share
🗳️
Want to meet the candidates for D.C.'s delegate to Congress? We're hosting a debate with SpotlightDC and The Washington Informer on Thursday, May 14. RSVP for free tickets — and find more info — here.
Meet the candidates running to be D.C.’s delegate to Congress

While D.C.’s mayoral race has been sucking up most of the proverbial political oxygen in the room, there’s another high-stakes citywide contest where the long-term incumbent isn’t running again and whoever replaces her will face a complicated, uphill slog. We’re talking, of course, of D.C.’s non-voting delegate to Congress.

Eleanor Holmes Norton has held that seat since 1991, and she only ever faced nominal opposition for re-election. That changed last year, as it was becoming clear that Norton – at 88, one of the oldest members of an already gerontocratic Congress – just didn’t seem up to the task anymore

Her public appearances dwindled as challenges to D.C.’s autonomy from the White House and Republican-led Congress were ramping up. Even while friends and former aides publicly urged her to retire, Norton gave conflicting answers on her political future before finally announcing in late January what everyone else seemed to see as inevitable – she would not run again.

Norton’s departure hasn’t just opened up her seat, but, as candidate Kinney Zalesne told us, sparked the first “serious conversation about what the delegate job is” in decades. That opportunity initially attracted more than a dozen candidates, though only five made the ballot for the Democratic primary: Trent Holbrook, Greg Jaczko, Brooke Pinto, Robert White, and Zalesne. 

While the push for statehood has been most prominent in recent years (the House twice passed a statehood bill six years ago), that’s not all D.C.’s delegate focuses on. Indeed, Norton gained such prominence because of everything else she did: negotiating with Republicans to temper their interference in local affairs, securing federal funding for city projects and initiatives, and waging symbolic battles big and small to try to ensure the District is treated like a state. 

Meet the Democratic candidates –  two sitting members of the D.C. Council, one of Norton’s recent staffers, a former nuclear regulator, and a prominent Democratic fundraiser – looking to succeed her. Whomever wins will go on to face non-Democratic candidates in the November election (there’s currently one Republican and one Statehood Green in the race, and independent candidates can jump in.)

Trent Holbrook

Norton hasn’t endorsed a successor, and it’s unclear if she will. But Trent Holbrook is approaching the race with the view that proximity to the legend is the next best thing.

The 40-year-old Dupont Circle resident worked for eight years as a legislative staffer in Norton’s Capitol Hill office (he left shortly after declaring his candidacy), a fact that he often reminds potential voters of. 

“I worked with Congresswoman Norton on this issue” has been a common refrain in recent debates. Whether it’s the statehood bill that cleared the House or the multiyear push to give D.C.’s mayor control of the National Guard, Holbrook says he knows not just the issues but also the politics and people involved in moving them forward – all by virtue of having sat alongside Norton as she waged those battles.

“I learned from the great while I was there,” he tells The 51st. 

He said Norton’s accomplishments – with him alongside her – are clear. Statehood became a cause célèbre among Democrats (after having failed to advance in the early 1990s), and over the years, many attempts to undo or change locally passed legislation were thwarted. “We’ve had a record number of attacks but very few actually stick,” he says. 

On the flip side, Holbrook says Norton didn’t only play defense; she knew what fights to pick on D.C.’s behalf and how to move them forward through the complex legislative process.  

“We had a great history in that office of knowing what moment we’re in, what’s moving, and what we could attach to it,” he says. “And that’s not something that comes to people, it takes years of experience.” 

Of course, it’s hard to tout proximity to Norton without having to answer questions about the controversy that dogged Norton for most of last year before she decided to retire: Did she hold on for too long as her mental and physical energy seemed to lapse? 

Holbrook answers that by saying he decided to jump into the race when “it was obvious” she wouldn’t run again, and while he didn’t directly address whether he and the rest of her staff was aware of her diminished state, he insists that she remained “one of the most effective lawmakers in American history.” (He adds, “I hope to be in her shape when I am 88.”)

Should he be elected to succeed his former boss, Holbrook says he would double down on pushing statehood. “One of the most important things the delegate has to do is continue to make it the national priority it should be,” he says. At the same time, he says he will keep up Norton’s history of fighting to defend and expand home rule and using the office to advocate for D.C. to be treated as an equivalent of a state for federal programs. 

He argues that the others running – especially his two competitors who currently serve on the D.C. Council – don’t have the right kind of experience to get the job done.

“This position is not like any position in government. You’re having to defend home rule and make advances on statehood. It’s not like being on D.C. Council where you are just working with Democrats,” he says. “It’s critical to have someone step in on Day 1 and start delivering.”

Greg Jaczko

We’re all aware of D.C.’s complaint that our residents suffer from the injustice of taxation without representation, but Greg Jaczko thinks far too much of the city’s fight has been focused on the latter instead of the former.

“We should make it no taxation until we get representation,” he tells The 51st.

The 55-year-old Tenleytown resident’s pitch is somewhat unexpected, but so too was his path into electoral politics. He has a doctorate in physics and came to D.C. 30 years ago for a science fellowship, eventually rising to serve as the chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under President Obama. He now has his own consulting firm on renewable energy. 

Jaczko says he was motivated to jump into the race because of how the Trump administration maligned and fired so many federal employees. “I didn’t see anyone in Congress really pushing back the way they should,” he says. “I thought, ‘I can run for office and make a difference or sit on my couch and complain about it.’”

If elected, Jaczko would push to be appointed to the House Oversight Committee, where he says he’d be best placed to fight for federal workers. “This country cannot function without the amazing people who work in the federal government,” he says. “We have to get them back and give them protections.”

Like everyone else vying to succeed Norton, Jaczko is a passionate supporter of D.C. home rule and statehood. But given the challenges of getting a statehood bill through Congress at this time, he is instead proposing to push a bill through that would exempt D.C. from federal taxation. (In 2024, D.C. paid $45 billion in federal taxes, more per capita than any state.)

“For the 30 years I have been here, we have focused on the representation part and not the taxation part. There are other jurisdictions like D.C. that are not states, and there the residents don’t pay federal taxes,” he says, referencing Puerto Rico. “We should use the power of the purse to make people recognize this injustice.”

It’s not a new idea – every now and again a D.C. resident pledges to withhold their federal taxes until the city is given statehood (the consequences for an individual doing so can be quite significant). It also interestingly has had at least some bipartisan support; the conservative Heritage Foundation once advocated for ending federal taxation for District residents. But Jaczko says now is as good a time as any to embrace it. 

“The goal is to get statehood, but this is a different tactical approach,” he says. ”It brings awareness because you have the rest of the country crying about unfairness. You reverse the discussion and it can move you closer to statehood.”

And, he adds, there’s a fringe benefit for a D.C. economy that’s been ravaged by Trump’s decimation of the federal workforce. “You can imagine if D.C. doesn’t pay a federal tax,” he says, “every corporation would want an office in D.C.” Charge them some higher local taxes, he adds, and voila: more revenue for the city.

“There is a degree of autonomy that comes from having more resources,” he adds.

Brooke Pinto

When Ward 2 Councilmember Brooke Pinto recently unveiled her first campaign ad this month, some were confused about why it focused on housing, an issue that she could just as well tackle by remaining in the council seat she has occupied since 2020.

Pinto doesn’t necessarily disagree. But she tells The 51st that while she is running for D.C. delegate to push for statehood and protect the city’s autonomy, she also wants to use federal leverage to focus on more practical daily matters. 

“I will be very focused on improving residents’ lives,” she says. “There are things to do locally [on housing]. But in Congress, this is an issue D.C. residents and Americans are facing that needs federal intervention.”

She wants to use that intervention to repeal the federal Height Act that limits how tall buildings can be; speed the transfer of old federal buildings and land to local control, so they can be used to build affordable housing; and declare more federal enterprise and opportunity zones, designated areas where investors are enticed with tax breaks. 

Pinto, 33, has most recently been known for her work on public safety on the council, where she shepherded legislation that increased penalties for gun crimes, expanded the use of pre-trial detention, and introduced the use of teen curfew zones to prevent so-called teen takeovers (advocates for criminal justice reform have often disagreed with her approaches). The Logan Circle resident says she’ll carry that experience with her to Capitol Hill, where Republicans often get involved in the city’s local affairs when it comes to crime.

“I’ve seen firsthand where the gaps are: the databases in our courts that are 50 years old, the gun control laws that are inconsistent in our region so we have illegal guns flowing in from Maryland and Virginia, our GPS monitors that run out of batteries,” she says. “All of those are federal functions where having someone who is an expert on public safety will allow me to move the ball.”

Pinto’s campaign has had a rocky go of things recently, though. Seeing White as her biggest competition, her campaign published unredacted opposition research on White and his family last month. The move sparked outrage from her council colleague; she ultimately apologized but refused to drop out of the race as he demanded. 

Pinto, a Connecticut native, has also had to fight off claims that she doesn’t know D.C. well enough to represent it in Congress. (Some of those out-of-town connections have helped her raise more than $1.2 million, more than any of her competitors.) But she rejects those arguments. 

“It’s the city I love, and it’s my home. It’s my life’s work to protect it. I think most people across D.C. get that, and they see that in my record, in my commitment,” she says. “We are an inclusive city that should be welcoming to everybody who comes here.”

That, though, brings her back to her focus on housing – and how the lack of affordable options is impacting longtime Washingtonians. “One of the biggest concerns I hear from Black residents is about displacement in large part due to the rising costs of housing, which is why addressing the affordable housing crisis is my number one priority,” she says.

Robert White

Up until last summer, At-Large Councilmember Robert White says he thought he would run for mayor, reprising his failed 2022 bid for the city’s top job. But, he tells The 51st that in early August “it became uncomfortably clear how under threat D.C.’s home rule is and that Congresswoman Norton was likely to retire.” A month later, White made the call: He was running to succeed her.

“There’s a unique historic opportunity to move D.C. statehood forward right now,” he says. “D.C. residents are much more active on local issues than they have been historically. We had been beaten on decade after decade, so there was never much of a reaction when Congress did things. That’s very different now. People are scared, and they are showing up.”

White, 44, is a known quantity in D.C. politics, having held a citywide seat on the council for a decade. He says that his tenure on the council – and that he’s a native Washingtonian and the only Black contender in the race – makes him uniquely able to connect to and mobilize residents. 

“There’s no one who understands the city better personally and professionally,” he says. “Residents in the city know me and they trust me. You can’t be negotiating and bargaining for a city you don’t understand.” 

White also served as legislative counsel to Norton from 2008 to 2013. And like every other candidate, he says he would marshal local and national forces to push D.C. statehood through Congress. But White says he’d also aggressively pursue a seat on the House Appropriations Committee, where he could better direct federal funds to the city and head off the usual budget riders that Republicans use to tell D.C. what to do (or not do.)

He wants to focus on stabilizing D.C.’s economy and thinks he could play a role by pushing to transfer federal lands around L’Enfant Plaza to local control and team up with regional partners to advocate for federal payments to make up for the significant impact of Trump’s cuts to the federal workforce. 

And, like Jaczko, White is interested in tax policy: He’d like to adopt a Puerto Rico-style system where businesses that move into the city don’t have to pay federal taxes on the money they make here. “That’s a model we can use to attract businesses to D.C.,” he says.

White touts endorsements from the Congressional Black Caucus, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, local unions, at least two council colleagues (Janeese Lewis George and Charles Allen), and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts). Still, his fundraising has lagged behind both Pinto and Zalesne, and he drew criticism for a social media post joking about the shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner. (He later deleted it, calling it “inappropriate and insensitive.”) 

He’s bullish on his chances in the race, and on Pinto and Zalesne, pointedly argues that “this is not the time for a person that believes they can buy a seat or wants to learn in the position.”

Kinney Zalesne

If there’s a fringe beneficiary of the political mud that White and Pinto have been throwing at each other, it may well be Kinney Zalesne

The Cleveland Park resident was among the first to jump into the race for Norton’s seat, seeing an early start as vital to being able to introduce herself to an electorate that had likely never heard of her. Since then, Zalesne, 59, has raised more than $660,000 for the race, taking advantage of connections she built in her career in the federal government, leading a non-profit focused on helping D.C. kids get to college, at Microsoft, and, more recently, as a prominent fundraiser for the Democratic Party.

While there are five candidates in the race, Zalesne is pretty clear that she sees the real contest as being between her, Pinto, and White. And she seems more than happy to see the two of them battle it out in public; it buttresses her argument that being a local lawmaker doesn’t naturally make them more suited to be D.C. delegate.

“It’s not a step up from the D.C. Council,” she tells The 51st about the role of D.C. delegate. “That has never been the path. Because there is no vote, the power of the role is not in the position, it’s the person. Eleanor made it what she did because she had national networks and national experience. She turned her strengths into the role and served D.C. fiercely. I am aiming to do the same.”

Zalesne says her own “unusual mix of experiences” will lend itself to what she says would be her priorities if she were elected D.C. delegate: autonomy and economy. “Autonomy is statehood and everything on the way, and economy is about reimagining and recreating our economy to be less dependent on the federal government,” she says.

On autonomy, Zalesne would immediately call a “statehood summit” after the June 16 primary to refine the messaging and strategy around getting a statehood bill passed in Congress. She says her recent experience of fundraising for the DNC gives her relationships on Capitol Hill she could leverage to bolster the push for statehood. Zalesne also says more public education is needed; she envisions a broad advertising campaign targeting visitors, with the possible tagline, “Welcome to D.C., we’re the last colony.”

“We can launch a lot of new energy and creativity and discipline and focus,” she says. “Sharper, edgier, based on research, metrics-driven. Everything you want to do when you actually want to win, not just be indignant.”

Zalesne says she’d also push to create a Capitol Caucus in the House made of representatives from surrounding states, which could be a vehicle for diversifying the region’s economy. “If we collaborate better as neighbors, it would make a big difference,” she says.

As she continues her campaign, Zalesne is leveraging her time at the DNC to good effect; she’s touting endorsements from three sitting members of the House, among other figures. That may only go so far for most D.C. residents, though, so in late April she launched what she says is a “major six-figure multi-platform” advertising campaign that will last seven weeks. And she seems to hope that Pinto and White will keep taking shots at each other.

“They are unseasoned. They are not ready for the national stage. They are embarrassing themselves,” she says. “With those kinds of blunders, will they actually get us statehood?”

Read the whole story
mareino
3 days ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

The Asteroid and the Meaning of Life

1 Share
PERSON:


PERSON:
Read the whole story
mareino
3 days ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

The 2025 Metropolitan Sprawl Rankings | Center for Smart Transportation

1 Comment

Top 10 Most Compact and Connected Metropolitan Areas (nationwide) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
1San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA242.9
2New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ227.4
3Philadelphia, PA220.8
4Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL158.4
5Trenton-Princeton, NJ152.2
6Boston, MA145.9
7Chicago-Naperville-Evanston, IL145.1
8Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA143.3
9San Rafael, CA141.7
10Boulder, CO141.6

Top 10 Compact and Connected Large Metropolitan Areas (population of over 1 million) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
1San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA242.9
2New York-Jersey City-White Plains, NY-NJ227.4
3Philadelphia, PA220.8
4Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL158.4
5Boston, MA145.9
6Chicago-Naperville-Evanston, IL145.1
7Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA137.7
8Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI134.3
9Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA132.7
10Oakland-Berkeley-Livermore, CA130.3

Top 10 Most Compact and Connected Medium-sized Metropolitan Areas (population of between 500,000 and 1 million) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
1Madison, WI126.3
2Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT120.1
3Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA117.3
4New Haven-Milford, CT117.0
5Modesto, CA115.7
6Lexington-Fayette, KY115.5
7Stockton, CA109.6
8Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA109.0
9Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA108.5
10Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA107.8

Top 10 Most Compact and Connected small Metropolitan Areas (population of under 500,000) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
1Trenton-Princeton, NJ152.2
2Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA143.3
3San Rafael, CA141.7
4Boulder, CO141.7
5Champaign-Urbana, IL136.5
6San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA135.4
7Springfield, IL135.2
8Erie, PA132.2
9Charleston, WV130.9
10Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA130.6

The following tables present the list of the most sprawling metropolitan areas and divisions.

Top 10 Most Sprawling Metropolitan Areas (nationwide) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
224Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH65.1
225Jacksonville, NC63.7
226Greenville-Anderson, SC63.4
227Baton Rouge, LA62.5
228Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC60.1
229Fayetteville, NC60.0
230Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC57.9
231Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN57.4
232Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, GA57.2
233Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA54.3

Top 10 Most Sprawling Large Metropolitan Areas (population of over 1 million) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
208Jacksonville, FL73.0
211Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA72.7
212Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC72.6
216Raleigh-Cary, NC71.0
217San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX70.7
219Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX69.9
223Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI65.2
231Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN57.4
232Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, GA57.2
233Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA54.3

Top 10 Most Sprawling Medium-sized Metropolitan Areas (population of between 500,000 - 1 million) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
205Columbia, SC73.8
210Greensboro-High Point, NC72.8
214Chattanooga, TN-GA71.3
218Jackson, MS70.2
220Knoxville, TN69.8
221Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC69.4
222Winston-Salem, NC68.6
226Greenville-Anderson, SC63.4
227Baton Rouge, LA62.5
229Fayetteville, NC60.0

Top 10 Most Sprawling Small Metropolitan Areas (population of under 500,000) in 2020

RankMetropolitan AreaIndex Score
196Killeen-Temple, TX79.3
204Clarksville, TN-KY73.8
207Salisbury, MD-DE73.2
209Longview, TX72.9
213Huntsville, AL71.4
215Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA71.2
224Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH65.1
225Jacksonville, NC63.7
228Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC60.1
230Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC57.9
Read the whole story
mareino
4 days ago
reply
DC is the #6 post compact county; Alexandria, Arlington, & Falls Church are #9, #11, and #12. But the rest of the DC region is waaaay down the list.
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories