5226 stories
·
16 followers

The physical weight of Trumpism

2 Shares

Welcome to Doomsday Scenario, my regular column on national security, geopolitics, history, and—unfortunately—the fight for democracy in the Trump era. I hope if you’re coming to this online, you’ll consider subscribing right here. It’s easy—and free:

One constant theme of conversations I’ve had over the last year has been the physical heaviness people feel in Trump’s America. I certainly felt it yesterday in the wake of that horrific murder — there’s nothing else to call it — of a mother by an out-of-control ICE officer in Minneapolis.

Today, though, in the wake of the Minneapolis murder, I want to focus on the physical toll of Trumpism to our nation and our collective daily psyche.

To me, there’s actually a simple explanation for that heaviness: It’s the weight of the shift from “zero to non-zero.” There are so many aspects of our daily life that we’d never had to weigh before; so many new possible horrors that we have to carry in our minds each day. We forget how much of the basic fabric of our country has been altered in the space of just a year, how many of our freedoms have been impinged, and how many things we took for granted that now we can’t.

A vigil last night in Minneapolis for Renee Nicole Good. (Photo by David Berding/Getty Images)

Before last year, there was — effectively — a zero percent chance that as a US resident walking the streets, regardless of immigration status, you’d be swept up by masked secret police and deported to a foreign torture gulag.

Before last year, if you were a dedicated federal employee there was a zero percent chance your department, bureau, or agency would be closed over the course of the weekend, with decades of work by thousands of people, who had carefully stewarded taxpayer dollars to accomplish a mission authorized and supported by bipartisan congresses across decades tossed in the “woodchipper” before any had the chance to object, dooming millions of the world’s most vulnerable to die in the years to come to feed the ego of a single tech oligarch.

Before last year, if you were a daycare worker, there was — effectively — a zero percent chance that immigration agents (or right-wing influencers) would barge into the safe space you had worked so hard to create havoc and, in some cases, do physical violence.

Before last year, if you were an immigrant parent without a criminal record, there was — effectively — a zero percent chance that dropping off your child at school would lead to your detention and immediate removal from your country.

Before last year, if you were a graduate student, professor, or medical researcher working on a long-term federally-funded study, one that had gone through the interminable approval processes and started up to help lives and advance the frontiers of our collective knowledge, you didn’t have to worry your funding would disappear overnight — that you’d be out of a job, your months or years of research thrown into the trash, your own professional trajectory destroyed and the lives of your research subjects upended in a matter of hours or a few days. Similarly, if you were a university administrator, you didn’t have to wake up each morning wondering if the federal government has, without warning or process, canceled the visas of your students.

Before last year, if you were an international student or here on a green card or long-term visa, there was — effectively — a zero percent chance that exercising what you correctly considered your First Amendment rights to free speech would result in your expulsion from the country.

Before last year, if you were a dedicated nonpartisan prosecutor or federal agent, pursuing the best tradition of the Justice Department’s mission to do justice “without fear or favor,” there was — effectively — a zero percent chance that you’d be fired or removed simply for pursuing a valid case.

Before last year, if you were a parent you could have — effectively — zero doubt that the nation’s leading health professionals would act in the best interests of your children and your community, following the best science and recommendations they could to keep us all safe.

Before last year, if you were one of the thousands of dedicated museum workers, Smithsonian employees, Park Rangers, or historical interpreters tasked with telling the complicated story of our nation to visitors from around the world, there was — effectively — a zero percent chance that you would find yourself having to erase important figures from the nation’s story and instead tell history in the way that the President of the United States decreed.

Before last year, if you were an American, there was effectively a zero percent chance that you’d wake up to the news that historic parts of the White House itself were being destroyed without warning or consultation to feed the president’s ego.

Before last year, if you ran a legally independent nonprofit and weren’t engaged in some criminal activity or fraud, there was effectively zero chance that armed federal officers would show up at the direction of the White House, seize your building, fire your staff, and slap the president’s name on it.

Before last year, if Congress had discussed, debated, and passed a critical appropriation affecting your life — whether it was authorization for your government agency or a grant to help support your local community or something else — there was a zero percent chance that the Treasury wouldn’t follow through and pay the bill.

Before last year, if you criticized the president, there was a zero percent chance that the president would demand you be criminally prosecuted and proceed to fire anyone who refused until he found some flunky willing to indict you on kangaroo court charges.

Before last year, if you were the CEO of a healthy public US company, there was a zero percent chance that the US government would demand a share of your company in exchange for you being allowed to continue doing business.

Before last year, if you were a media executive, there was a zero percent chance you would have to pay a bribe — directly or indirectly — to the president to get a merger approved, a broadcast license renewed, or fire on-air talent who didn’t meet with the president’s personal approval.

Before last year, if you ran one of the hottest companies in the entire world, the maker of a product in demand everywhere, there was a zero percent chance that the US government would demand an unconstitutional export tax on your product to allow it to be sold overseas.

Before last year, if you were a fully documented legal US citizen, there was effectively a zero percent chance that a masked, armed federal officer would accost you walking on the street and demand “your papers, please,” and then arrest you.

If you were an ordinary non-famous professor, teacher, or librarian even a few years ago — not that long ago at all — there was effectively a zero percent chance that right-wing influencers, bad-faith parents, state governments, the White House, or trolling students would threaten your curriculum, dictate what books you carry in your library, record your classes to weaponize them on Fox News, protest their failing grade on national media, or have you fired for exercising free speech. 

Before last year, if you were trying to use the bathroom, there was an effectively zero percent chance an armed police officer would demand to see your ID before allowing you into the women’s restroom. 

If you were a federal judge, you knew that threats might come with the position, but there was a zero chance that the President of the United States would single you out for threats and encourage supporters to attack you for doing your job. Nor did you need to worry whether the US government officials appearing before you on behalf of the Justice Department would ignore your legally-binding court orders and lie to you in court.

Now, in both instances, that chance is at least non-zero.

And then there’s this week’s other big news: Before last year, if you were a NATO ally and partner of the United States, you never had to worry that one day the United States would begin, for seemingly no reason whatsoever, formulating military plans to seize your sovereign territory.

Not all of these changes and shifts are equal in importance, surely. Some are abstract, others very much tangible. Some personal, some communal. Surely, also, some of these shifts began to unfold before Trump returned to power — although in many cases his rise accelerated or encouraged the shift — and unfortunately some communities and populations have long had reasons to fear government in various forms or question the “protection” of the police, but never have Americans collectively experienced anything like the accumulation of mental weight we have in this last year.

All that weight is piled upon all that we also accumulated in 2020, from Covid to George Floyd to January 6th — the last, also disastrous year of another Trump presidency — and all that other mental weight we’ve accumulated that comes from the rising fear and collective understanding that because of GOP policies, far-right culture and media, and a nation that has lost its collective mind, you cannot count on being safe in the places where we should feel safest — synagogues, churches, schools, universities, offices, and more — and that when you kiss your children and send them to school, you can’t guarantee that they will come home at the end of the day.

That heaviness you feel, that drag on your mental health, that drain on your emotional energy and lethargy in the face of world events, like yesterday, is real. We are all carrying a lot of new weight in the era of Trumpism.

It’s the weight of non-zero.

As it turns out, that simple switch from zero to non-zero — even if it any or all of the above is still infinitesimally unlikely, it is no longer effectively zero. And that tiniest bit of switch, that binary shift from 0 to greater than zero, turns out to be something that we can all feel in our daily lives.

Before last year, if you were a mom, with a glovebox full of stuffed animals, driving your SUV through a peaceful residential street, eager to see your six-year-old child at the end of the day — a wife with no criminal record who had committed no federal crimes, not being sought by any authorities anywhere — a poet who cared about your neighbors — there was, effectively, a zero percent chance you had to worry about being shot in the face by masked, ill-trained, aggressive federal officers who would then pull their guns on a doctor who tried to help you and let you die in the street.

Now that chance is at least non-zero.

PS: If you’ve found this useful, I hope you’ll consider subscribing and sharing this newsletter with a few friends:

Read the whole story
mareino
5 hours ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
acdha
1 day ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Your water bill could soon go up. Here’s why.

1 Comment
Your water bill could soon go up. Here’s why.

You’ve probably noticed that your electric and gas bills in D.C. have been getting more and more expensive recently. Well, now your water bill might do the same.

Over the holidays, D.C. Water announced what would amount to a rate increase for many homeowners, tenants, and businesses in the city. The increase comes by way of a fee that’s tacked onto every bill based on the proportion of a property that’s impervious to water — surfaces like roofs, parking lots, or cement driveways. D.C. Water says it now has an improved way to measure these surfaces allowing it to better align the appropriate amount of the fee to any home.

The increase is linked to a years-long effort to clean up the Potomac and Anacostia rivers by dramatically reducing the amount of stormwater runoff flowing into them (both from old sewers and impervious surfaces). But its abrupt implementation prompted enough questions and complaints from residents that D.C. Water now says it’s holding off on imposing it until it can better explain what’s going on. 

Here’s everything you need to know.

CRIAC, ERUs – what the heck is all this?

It’s easy to get lost in all of the acronyms being thrown around, but you need to understand them to know why your water bill might go up.

They’re part of D.C. Water’s Clean Rivers Project, a multi-year $3.5 billion infrastructure project kicked off in 2009 to clean up the city’s rivers. The heart of the project is the construction of 18 miles of underground tunnels that will hold runoff before sending it to be treated, preventing past practices of just dumping it untreated into the rivers. Those tunnels are being paid for in large part by the Clean Rivers Impervious Area Charge (CRIAC), a fee assessed on properties in the city based on how much impervious surface they have. 

That fee is measured as an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU); 1 ERU is roughly 1,000 square feet of impervious surface on your property, and each ERU now costs homeowners around $24 a month. The bigger the home and the more of the land that is impervious, the more ERUs you’ll be assessed and the larger the CRIAC fee you will pay. In 2025, the average citywide CRIAC payment was $23.24 — or $278 a year — but it varied significantly, ranging from $19.29 in Ward 8 to $34.69 in Ward 3.

So what is D.C. Water actually doing differently now that’s leading to higher bills?

In short, it’s not that D.C. Water has dramatically raised the rate for every ERU – they’ve gone up a few bucks a year recently – but rather that the utility says they’ve gotten better at measuring impervious surfaces. A new aerial assessment of D.C. was conducted in March 2025 — the first in almost a decade.

“We utilize aerial imagery to calculate measurements,” writes D.C. Water spokeswoman Sherri Lewis in an email to The 51st. “Advances in aerial imagery allow us to measure impervious areas more precisely including areas that may not have been previously detected in 2016, to provide equitable assessments and ensure everyone is paying their fair share across the District.”

Say D.C. Water missed that patio of yours the last time it did a survey almost a decade ago. Well, it’s not missing it anymore — and that’s going to be reflected on your monthly bill. Or maybe tree cover made it tough to fully assess your property the last time D.C. Water did so, back in 2016. Not anymore.

How significant are some of the changes to water bills?

It all depends on your property, but in one letter to a resident we saw, a home that had been charged for 1 ERU would now be charged for 2.4 of them. So if that single ERU would have cost that homeowner some $24 every month ( the going rate this year), the new survey and assessment would increase it to almost $58 — a jump of 140%. 

Now, not everyone in D.C. is going to see that type of increase — or an increase at all. Lewis says 72% of the city’s 110,000 residential customers should see no change, 2% will see a decrease, and 26% are in line for an uptick.

But nothing about my house has changed. Why is my bill going up?

Needless to say, if you’re in that 26%, you may feel like you’re getting soaked, especially if you say nothing about your home or property is any different now than it was years ago.

“There has been no change to our impervious area since we purchased our home in 2001,” wrote one irate resident this week on a neighborhood listserv. Others quickly chimed in to agree.

It’s concerns like these that prompted quick complaints from residents and elected officials, as did understandable questions about why D.C. Water took almost a decade to conduct a new aerial assessment of the city — and whether the utility would share maps of both so residents could scrutinize them and appeal any increases. 

“You may have chosen to put in pervious pavers or some other way to do stormwater management rather than just paving over a surface,” says Ward 6 Councilmember Charles Allen, who chairs the council committee that oversees D.C. Water. “But a picture from a satellite doesn’t capture that very well, which puts the onus back on the homeowner if they’re seeing these big charges.”

D.C. Water was quick to concede that there are more questions than solid answers or explanations. “Our initial communication did not provide enough information or time for you to fully understand the change,” wrote the utility in letters to customers announcing that it would pause the implementation of the new charges. During this pause, D.C. Water says it will be working to “provide clearer explanations about how impervious areas are measured,” as well as giving customers “time to review their property data and understand what changed.”

How long is this pause going to last? And will water bills continue to go up?

D.C. Water hasn’t said how long it will hold off on imposing the new charges; officials tell The 51st that the priority now is better communicating why some bills are going up and addressing concerns from individual homeowners. 

Still, at some point they will go up — and then continue going up. While construction on the Clean Rivers Project tunnels is expected to wrap up in 2030,  work is underway on the Potomac tunnel near the Kennedy Center, and soon to start on the Piney Branch tunnel. The CRIAC fees are expected to be around for a lot longer than that to help pay for all the work.

Per documents submitted to the council last year, monthly CRIAC fees will continue to go up through 2030 (when they will top out at more than $32 per ERU per month), and then stabilize around $29 a month in the years after. 

And complaints about those fees are likely to flare up again. It was almost a decade ago that churches and non-profit groups said the CRIAC fees — which some dismissively referred to as a “rain tax” — were a heavy burden for them, threatening their continued existence in the city. In response, the council created a mechanism for D.C. Water to offer them some relief. (For a list of all assistance programs, check here.)

Now, it’s always worth remembering that all of this is for a good cause: cleaning up the Anacostia and Potomac rivers. And while doing so is a slow and somewhat painful slog, it seems to be showing results. Last year the Anacostia Watershed Society said that “overall the river continues steady progress toward a clean and healthy future.” A large part of that is the tunnels that have already been built to hold stormwater runoff when D.C. gets hit by large storms; D.C. Water says the tunnels already functioning have helped achieve a 98% reduction in sewage runoff into the rivers.

Read the whole story
mareino
1 day ago
reply
Improved aerial imagery revealed impervious surfaces in the city that were missed in old surveys -- which means more accurate bills, but it'll surely be a sticker shock to those who got lucky on the old surveys.
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

A Few Things I’m Pretty Sure About

2 Shares

Things I’ve been thinking about lately …

I broke my back skiing when I was a teenager. It’s still screwed up and I occasionally tweak it, leaving me in agony for a few days. When I’m in pain I’ve noticed: I’m irritable, short-tempered, and impatient. I try hard to not be, but pain can override the best intentions.

One lesson I’ve tried to learn is that whenever I see someone being a jerk, my knee-jerk reaction is to think, “What an asshole.” My second reaction is: maybe his back hurts.

It’s not an excuse, but a reminder that all behavior makes sense with enough information. You can always see people’s actions, but rarely (if ever) what’s happening in their head.

Here’s a related point: Most harm done to others is unintentional. I think the vast majority of people are good and well-meaning, but in a competitive and stressful world it’s easy to ignore how your actions affect others.

Roy Baumeister writes in his book Evil:

Evil usually enters the world unrecognized by the people who open the door and let it in. Most people who perpetrate evil do not see what they are doing as evil. Evil exists primarily in the eye of the beholder, especially in the eye of the victim.

One consequence of this is that it’s easy to underestimate bad things happening in the world. If I ask myself, “How many people want to cause harm?” I’d answer “very few.” If I ask, “How many people can do mental gymnastics to convince themselves that their actions are either not harmful or justified?” I’d answer … almost everybody.

An iron rule of math is that 50% of the population has to be below average. It’s true for income, intelligence, health, wealth, everything. And it’s a brutal reality in a world where social media stuffs the top 1% of moments of the top 1% of people in your face.

You can raise the quality of life for those below average, or set a floor on how low they can go. But when a majority of people expect a top 5% outcome the result is guaranteed mass disappointment.

I think the majority of society problems are all downstream of housing affordability. The median age of first-time homebuyers went from 29 in 1981 to 40 today. But the shock this causes is so much deeper than housing. When young people are shut out of the life-defining step of having their own place, they’re less likely to get married, less likely to have kids, have worse mental health, and – my theory – more likely to have extreme political views, because when you don’t feel financially invested in your community you’re less likely to care about the consequences of bad policy.

Every economic issue is complex, but this one seems pretty straight forward: we should build more homes. Millions of them, as fast as we can. It’s the biggest opportunity to make the biggest positive impact on society.

I heard someone say recently that the reason so many people are skeptical AI will improve society – or are terrified it will do the opposite – is because it’s not clear the internet (and phones) made their life better.

That’s a subjective point, but it got me thinking: Imagine if you asked people 25 years after these things were invented whether life was better or worse because of their existence: Electricity, radio, airplane, refrigeration, air conditioning, antibiotics, etc.

I think nearly everyone would say “better.” It wouldn’t even be a question.

The internet is unique in the history of technology because there’s a list of things it improved (communication, access to information) but another list of things it likely made worse for almost everybody (political polarization, dopamine addiction from social media, less in-person interaction, lower attention spans, the spread of misinformation.)

There aren’t many examples throughout history of technology so universal with so many obvious downsides relative to what existed before it. But the wounds are so fresh that it’s not surprising many look at AI with the same fear.

This is more hope than prediction, but I wouldn’t be surprised if in 20 years we look back at this era of political nastiness as a generational bottom we grew out of.

There’s a long history of Americans cycling through how they feel about government and how politicians treat each other.

The 1930s were unbelievably vicious. There was a well organized plot to overthrow Franklin Roosevelt and replace him with a Marine general named Smedley Butler, who would effectively become dictator. The Great Depression made Americans lose so much faith in government that the prevailing view was, “hey, might as well give this a shot.”

It would have sounded preposterous if someone told you in the 1930s that by the 1950s more than 70% of Americans said they trusted the government to do the right thing almost all the time. But that’s what happened.

And it would have sounded preposterous in the 1950s if you told Americans within 20 years trust would collapse amid the Vietnam War and Watergate.

It would have sounded preposterous if you told Americans in the 1970s that within 20 years trust and faith in government would have surged amid 1990s prosperity and balanced budgets.

And equally absurd if you told Americans in the 1990s that we’d be where we are today.

Cycles are so hard to predict, because it’s easier to forecast in straight lines. What’s almost impossible to detect in real time is the same forces fueling public opinion plant the seeds of their own demise. When times are good, people get complacent and stop caring about good governance. When times are bad they get fed up and say, “Enough of this.” And I think we’re not far from that today.

I have a theory about nostalgia: It happens because the best survival strategy in an uncertain world is to overworry. When you look back, you forget about all the things you worried about that never came true. So life appears better in the past because in hindsight there wasn’t as much to worry about as you were actually worrying about at the time.

Read the whole story
mareino
1 day ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
freeAgent
3 days ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

https://screenshotsofdespair.tumblr.com/post/804929951721734144

1 Share

Image

Read the whole story
mareino
4 days ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

Norway Bought Almost No Gas Cars Last Year

2 Shares
Even with Chinese carmakers increasing their market share and presence, Tesla has remained the bestseller.

Read the whole story
mareino
5 days ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
freeAgent
6 days ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Autism Hasn’t Increased

3 Shares

Autism diagnoses have increased but only because of progressively weaker standards for what counts as autism.

The autistic community is a large, growing, and heterogeneous population, and there is a need for improved methods to describe their diverse needs. Measures of adaptive functioning collected through public health surveillance may provide valuable information on functioning and support needs at a population level. We aimed to use adaptive behavior and cognitive scores abstracted from health and educational records to describe trends over time in the population prevalence of autism by adaptive level and co-occurrence of intellectual disability (ID). Using data from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, years 2000 to 2016, we estimated the prevalence of autism per 1000 8-year-old children by four levels of adaptive challenges (moderate to profound, mild, borderline, or none) and by co-occurrence of ID. The prevalence of autism with mild, borderline, or no significant adaptive challenges increased between 2000 and 2016, from 5.1 per 1000 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6–5.5) to 17.6 (95% CI: 17.1–18.1) while the prevalence of autism with moderate to profound challenges decreased slightly, from 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2–1.7) to 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1–1.4). The prevalence increase was greater for autism without co-occurring ID than for autism with co-occurring ID. The increase in autism prevalence between 2000 and 2016 was confined to autism with milder phenotypes. This trend could indicate improved identification of milder forms of autism over time. It is possible that increased access to therapies that improve intellectual and adaptive functioning of children diagnosed with autism also contributed to the trends.

The data is from the US CDC.

Hat tip: Yglesias who draws the correct conclusion:

Study confirms that neither Tylenol nor vaccines is responsible for the rise in autism BECAUSE THERE IS NO RISE IN AUTISM TO EXPLAIN just a change in diagnostic standards.

Earlier Cremieux showed exactly the same thing based on data from Sweden and earlier CDC data.

Happy New Year. This is indeed good news, although oddly it will make some people angry.

The post Autism Hasn’t Increased appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

Read the whole story
mareino
7 days ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
freeAgent
9 days ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories